Mortification of Spin Hits a Homerun!

By | April 20, 2016

2016-04-20 Mort of Spin - super episode


This latest Mortification of Spin podcast is outstanding.  Though not mentioned by name, hosts Carl Trueman, Todd Pruitt and Aimee Byrd are clearly referring to C.J. Mahaney and the latest T4G Conference. I nearly yelled out a Bob Kauflin YES! while listening to this program!  It is so gratifying to finally hear from Christian leaders  who clearly understand the problem and boldly address it. Go to this link to hear the whole program.


Submit Comment

newest oldest
Notify of

[…] victims say is true.  Todd Pruitt (and others, on Tom Chantry, apparently inconsistent with this acclaimed MoS noted on thouarttheman from 8 months before [although read here the response of R. Scott Clark to Todd Wilhelm’s […]


Finally heard the pod cast. So excellent!!!!!!!

Todd, I saw your comment over at TWW under their “Mortification of Spin Hosts Discuss Abusive Pulpits on Bully Pulpit Broadcast,” dated Fri Apr 22, 2016 at 01:30 AM, in which you responded to Lea who asked, “What I don’t get…is why he was accepted into the sbc!!…Why invite a potential problem into your org when you don’t have to?”

You responded, in part, with the following, “Mahaney donated in excess of $215,000…Any Questions?”

And not only the donations, but we know Mahaney ran away with the SGM operation, including the Pastor’s College, to Louisville, to be near Mohler, where students of the Pastor’s College took classes at the SBTS with the President’s approval. Sovereign Grace Church of Louisville, where CJ Mahaney is the Sr. Pastor, states on their About page that, “Sovereign Grace Church of Louisville also partners with the Southern Baptist Convention for the purposes of training and gospel mission.”

The Wartburg Watch also revealed under their Sept. 16, 2015 post entitled “Brother CJ Mahaney: He’s Done Gone and Joined the Southern Baptists!” that on the website, which lists Southern Baptist churches, that Mahaney’s Sovereign Grace Church of Louisville is listed there. Not only that, but under the SBC minister search, CJ Mahaney is listed as a SOUTHERN BAPTIST MINISTER, as well as Mahaney’s brother-in-law Gary Ricucci and son-in-law Brian Chesemore.

This all makes the interchange between Mohler and Mahaney at T4G 2016 of interest, during the “Day In Review,” involving Duncan, Mohler, Mahaney and Dever. Listen from 03:50 -04:20

MAHANEY: And Decker says, speaking of Calvin’s sermons on Job, that that’s where his pastoral pulse is most pronounced. And these sermons are unedited, so that you will find that ‘pastoral pulse’ in those sermons in the Old Testament in a way you won’t find in the Institutes.

MOHLER: See, that’s just your inner Southern Baptist (laughter) – the illiteration: “Pastoral Pulse. The Perfect Priority of the Pastoral Pulse.” (laughter)

MAHANEY: “I don’t think I have any inner Southern Baptist, I’m not sure what what you’re talking about there.”

MOHLER: “It’s just aching to get out.” (laughter)

So, if Mahaney doesn’t have any inner Southern Baptist, as he is seen seriously proclaiming in front of 10,000 people, then what is behind his close affiliation with them? And if there’s no “inner Southern Baptist” at work within Mahaney, then why is he a Southern Baptist Minister? Why is his church listed as a Southern Baptist Church? Why has his Pastor’s College “partnered with the SBC for the purposes of training and gospel mission”? What is that all about if Mahaney doesn’t carry “any inner Southern Baptist” within him?

Perhaps it would be because Mahaney would say he’s just a humble™ man, concerned about the centrality of the gospel™, living the cross-centered™ life.


Also, so as not to put words in Janna’s mouth- I meant, “I suggest”- not I agree- that certain MINISTRIES be ignored. Ignoring comments is one thing, deciding I can no longer listen to whole ministries is obviously quite another. I am personally heartily disappointed at what I see as closing ranks against those not in leadership, and I can no longer listen to nor trust ministries like that. As I said, grieving this, and apologies for so many comments this time around. God bless!


And finally: if Todd P was not in fact referring to commenters at TWW in his tweet I came across, I do sincerely apologize to him for my assumption. Thank you to Todd Wulhelm for all you do. And I am very glad MOS did this podcast. Truth has authority.


Thanks Janna. I think the whole go-privately-about-public-issues is a way to stifle dissent. I know that is the expectation among some in Todd’s circle but I am past taking the bait. I was shocked at Todd’s response at TWW where I felt discussion was going quite respectfully with valid points being made. I feel he needs a reality check of the impact of both Carl’s actions and now his defensiveness, and having seen his tweet about his view of watch blog commenters I do not trust him.

TWW were, in fact, standing up for MOS there, and some of us-many Christians-simply want to know what Carl is going to do about how his involvement was used against victims and the many Christians involved who care.

Thank you for letting me know there has been progress. That is encouraging to me.

I grieve to know what victims’ families have gone through trying to get justice, when the response that honest questioning gets from Todd and those at Grace To You let alone TGC/T4G is so antagonistic, convoluted, and unteachable. I truly hope they start to understand the reason people are frustrated. The smearing of fellow believers who speak forthrightly has gone on long enough in evangelicalism.

Hello Melody:

Just a couple thoughts. One, I’ll let Todd get back to you yet want to say that we appreciate your comments. I do think that you can e-mail Todd privately, but there’s no need to do so if you’re simply disagreeing with him about an issue which you have backed up by intelligent reasoning, per our comment guidelines. Which you have.

It sounds as though the situation has changed, since Todd and I wrote our initial comments about Todd Pruitt’s and Carl Trueman’s podcast.

Please give us a chance to re-evaluate our thoughts about the matter.

Thanks. Janna


Further to my further to comment: I do understand the desire to stand with a pastor, that motivated the initial stances. I do. I’ve sat with a pastor who was deeply wounded by church bullies. The issue here is that I’m still seeing truth tellers and thinkers attacked as unsubmissive to authority. But whose or what authority? I’ll be honest, church authority these days is more like papal stuff than biblical authority, precisely because these men are willing to listen to other men and pastors than treat all members of the Body equally under the authority of the Word of God. Even the “good” ones are guilty of this.

Until that imbalance is corrected and pastors have a humility and gentleness towards those who oppose, realizing it’s not about them, I don’t think we can be sure women and children are safe from abuse. I’m very tired of being labeled unsubmissive, ungodly, unbiblical, or even egalitarian for saying that. Those are blinders that need to come off among the Reformed men.

I’m still waiting to see some humility among these. A good podcast and speaking some truth is not enough. I’m glad for it, but nothing has changed in several hearts towards the hurting.


I’m going to update agreeing with Janna again. Not sure if anything has changed over the weekend, but I have watched things go down on Twitter and the Wartburg Watch that disturb me.

I will say this here, because Todd is not striking me as a person I feel safe to email privately.

He came on TWW blistering about slander (and I saw no willful attempt to smear anyone, simply some concerned questioning) when legitimate critique of his friend was at issue. He needed a hard reality check of how much hurt has been caused but instead of being gentle and listening he decided to be harsh.

If that is how he responds to criticism, his tweet about people who hate Biblical authority tells me a lot.

Cynically, it looks like MOS wanted to get on the right side of this, but they don’t see anything wrong with immature pastoring.

That means this will just happen in their circles again and again. Until certain men are mature and humble towards fellow Christians, instead of assuming we reject authority because we don’t respect their actions on something, this culture of lording it over isn’t going to change.

It struck me this weekend that Phil Johnson loves vs 19 of 1 Timothy 5. I would challenge him to read in context, because this whole mess is about the serious sin of partiality.

Bill M

At first I thought the “nailed it” graphic used for this post was a flawed but on further contemplation it appears to sum up for me the pod cast. To clarify the nail doesn’t get bent if you hit it squarely with the hammer. As someone who pounded thousands of nails while growing up, my father was a builder, I can speak with authority on the subject of pounding nails.

With Carl Trueman’s silence about his former position and Todd Pruitt imperious accusations of slander on TWW, I see their new position as a glancing blow. It is a small step requiring more work. Unfortunately a nail once bent will not be driven in, it will not hold.

Ron Oommen

Had the same thoughts about Carl Trueman myself. He and the other two basically exonerated Mahaney of wrongdoing by asserting his biblical qualifications to remain a pastor. Is he changing his opinion now? If so, might be useful if he actually came out and said so and admitted he was wrong before. On the other hand if this is the same opinion he always had then that whitewash statement needs some explaining.

Something still doesn’t quite add up for me.

At least someone’s stating the obvious, finally.
Would be helpful if they actually come out and say it instead of dancing around like Apollo Creed around Rocky Balboa. Would it kill them to say this is about Mahaney or whoever else?


Great points here. With respect to culture of the Brit in the mix, having grown up in his home country and knowing their politesse, is it however true he found nothing wrong with CJ back in the day? I commented about this on TWW but haven’t had a chance to check back and see if Carl Trueman’s has backtracked that verdict. Will he be willing to retract that analysis in light of the families’ testimony regarding CJ that we are aware of now? It seems to me the evangelical enabling is something we all would do well of repenting of, though some are clearly further along in repenting of that than others. What if we all just got real and named names? Not to shame but to warn and heal?


I said an emphatic “yes!” three times while listening. Yes, they nailed it! Hope lots of people get to hear it….especially those who need to hear it the most.